Nostalgic Book Review: The Flame and the Flower by Kathleen E. Woodiwiss

Can you enjoy a romance while recognizing that parts of it are deeply uncomfortable by today's standards?

That was the question I kept coming back to while reading The Flame and the Flower by Kathleen E. Woodiwiss.

This isn't technically part of the usual timeline for Books Your Mom Never Told You About. At 1972, it predates the '80s–early 2000s romances I usually focus on. But I wanted to go back and read one of the books that helped shape the romance genre into what it is today.

And I am VERY glad I did.

I'm also very glad I gave myself a few days to think about this one before trying to review it.

Because I have a lot of conflicting feelings.

📖 Book: The Flame and the Flower
✍️ Author: Kathleen E. Woodiwiss
⭐️ Rating: 3/5
📅 Published: 1972
🏛️ Genre: Historical Romance
⚠️ Content note: Non-consensual sexual content

• Why is The Flame and The Flower so important to the romance genre?

  Before getting into my thoughts on the book itself, it’s worth talking about why The Flame and the Flower is such an important book in romance history. Even if you’ve never read it, you’ve probably encountered some of the conventions it helped popularize.

  1. Credited with creating the bodice ripper genre
     The Flame and the Flower is widely credited with helping establish the bodice ripper as a romance subgenre.

  2. One of the first mass-produced, popular romance books with explicit, open-door scenes
     At a time when sexual content in romance was more likely to be implied, The Flame and the Flower pushed those scenes much further.

  3. Helped bring romance to a mass-market audience
     The book was distributed through mass-market channels, helping it reach a much larger audience than many of the traditional romance novels that came before it.

  4. Helped shape the romance genre that came after it
     Its success helped pave the way for the more sexually explicit and commercially successful romance novels that followed.

  5. Historically significant doesn't mean it holds up today
     The Flame and the Flower can be hugely influential to the genre while still containing elements that

• What are the tropes?

  🕰️ Historical Romance

  ⚔️ Enemies to Lovers

  💍 Marriage of Convenience

  🤰 Accidental Pregnancy

  🛏️ Forced Proximity

  🛡️ Protective Hero

  🔒 Emotionally Unavailable Hero

  🗡️ Touch Her & Die

• What is it about?

  to London with her aunt's brother. After he attempts to attack her, Heather flees into the streets, terrified and with nowhere to go. She is eventually found by two of Brandon's shipmates, who are looking for a woman for their captain. Believing Heather to be a prostitute, they bring her to Brandon, an American merchant preparing to return to America.

  Brandon is immediately captivated by Heather but mistakenly believes she is a prostitute. After discovering that she is actually a virgin, Heather tells him the truth about who she is and how she came to be there. Brandon nevertheless continues to pursue her and proposes that she become his mistress, which Heather firmly refuses. She eventually escapes and, with nowhere else to turn, returns to her aunt's home. Several weeks later, Heather discovers that she is pregnant. Brandon eventually finds her, and the two marry, forcing Heather to leave England and begin a new life with him in America.

  As Heather adjusts to her new marriage and life in the Carolinas, the story also introduces a thread of mystery and suspense surrounding women in the town who are turning up dead. Heather and Brandon must navigate conflicts involving his family, his past relationships, their marriage, and the growing mystery surrounding the deaths.

• What did I love?

  to London with her aunt's brother. After he attempts to attack her, Heather flees into the streets, terrified and with nowhere to go. She is eventually found by two of Brandon's shipmates, who are looking for a woman for their captain. Believing Heather to be a prostitute, they bring her to Brandon, an American merchant preparing to return to America.

  Brandon is immediately captivated by Heather but mistakenly believes she is a prostitute. After discovering that she is actually a virgin, Heather tells him the truth about who she is and how she came to be there. Brandon nevertheless continues to pursue her and proposes that she become his mistress, which Heather firmly refuses. She eventually escapes and, with nowhere else to turn, returns to her aunt's home. Several weeks later, Heather discovers that she is pregnant. Brandon eventually finds her, and the two marry, forcing Heather to leave England and begin a new life with him in America. As Heather adjusts to her new marriage and life in the Carolinas, the story also introduces a thread of mystery and suspense surrounding women in the town who are turning up dead. Heather and Brandon must navigate conflicts involving his family, his past relationships, their marriage, and the growing mystery surrounding the deaths.

• What didn't I love?

  Obviously, the biggest issue for me was the beginning of the book.

  There are non-consensual sexual scenes involving Heather and Brandon in the first chapter, and I found them extremely difficult to read.

  I don't think the fact that this book was written in 1972 means we have to ignore that discomfort.

  At the same time, I think the historical context is important.

  The story is set in 1799, and the expectations surrounding relationships, marriage, women, and sexuality were obviously very different from what we expect in a modern romance.

  I'm not a historical scholar, so I'm not going to pretend I can speak definitively about what people did or didn't understand about consent in 1799.

  But I do think it's worth considering when reading older romances:

  Do we want historical romance to reflect the attitudes and behaviors of the time period, or do we want it to give us the romantic fantasy we expect from the genre today?

  For me, the answer is somewhere in the middle.

  I want the historical context.

  But I also read romance as an escape. I want to fall in love with the characters, root for the relationship, and enjoy the romance.

  And personally, I wish the opening of this book had been written differently.

  There were also a few smaller moments throughout the book that stood out to me as things that would feel very different in a contemporary romance.

  There are moments where Brandon grips Heather's hands or arms extremely firmly, to the point of pain, and there is dialogue and behavior between the characters that feels very anachronistic when you're reading it through a modern lens.

  There was also a moment near the end that I felt made light of what happened between Heather and Brandon at the beginning, and that didn't sit well with me.

• Does it hold up in 2026?

  As a modern historical romance? I don't think it does.

  The opening is simply too difficult for me to overlook.

  And while I think the historical context is important, context doesn't erase the experience of reading those scenes as a modern reader.

  But as a piece of romance history? Absolutely.

  I'm really glad I read this book.

  It gave me a much better understanding of where some of the tropes, conventions, and expectations of modern romance came from.

  And I actually enjoyed much more of the book than I expected to.

  That's probably the strangest part of this entire reading experience.

  I went from being deeply uncomfortable with Brandon to genuinely rooting for him.

  And I felt guilty about it.

  I actually had to sit with that for a few days after finishing the book because I couldn't quite reconcile the two versions of Brandon in my head.

  But maybe that's also what makes reading these older romances so interesting.

  They're not always going to give us characters or relationships that we would accept today.

  Sometimes they're going to make us uncomfortable.

  Sometimes they're going to make us question why we're rooting for someone.

  And sometimes they're going to show us just how dramatically romance has changed.

• Alli's Scorecard

  Here's how The Flame and the Flower stacked up for me:

  💘 Romance ██████░░░░ 3/5
  🔥 Chemistry ███████░░░ 3.5/5
  👀 Tension ████████░░ 4/5
  🫶 Characters ███████░░░ 3.5/5
  📖 Story ████████░░ 4/5
  💔 Emotional Damage ███████░░░ 3.5/5
  🏛️ Historical Setting █████████░ 4.5/5
  🌶️ Spice ███████░░░ 3.5/5

Final Thoughts

The Flame and the Flower was one of the hardest books I've ever had to rate.

Not because I disliked it.

Actually, quite the opposite.

Once I got past the beginning, I became genuinely invested in the story. I enjoyed Heather and Brandon's relationship, loved the historical setting, and found myself surprisingly attached to Brandon's character.

But I can't separate the rest of the book from the non-consensual scenes that happen at the beginning.

For me, The Flame and the Flower doesn't hold up as a modern romance.

But I absolutely think it was worth reading as a piece of romance history.

And I think that's ultimately what Books Your Mom Never Told You About is about for me.

Not deciding whether an old romance is "good" or "bad," but looking at what worked, what absolutely does not work anymore, and understanding how the genre got from there to the romances we're reading today.

I'm really glad I read this one.

And yes, I will be reading The Wolf and the Dove and Shanna next.

Thanks to everyone who recommended this one.

Ready to read?

Get your copy of The Flame and the Flower from your favorite bookseller.

Shop Bookshop.org Shop Amazon

Some links are affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission if you make a purchase.